What we are witnessing is not patriotic —it is a series of unnecessary and harmful provocations that run counter to the spirit of the European Union.

It is natural for every country to take pride in its history, language, symbols, and traditions. That cultural richness is a cornerstone of Europe’s diversity and shared identity. But historical facts are clear—and so are their often painful consequences. Precisely because of this, at a time when Europe is increasingly confronted with dangerous nationalist tendencies, historical distortion, and divisive rhetoric, we must demonstrate greater political maturity and responsibility.

There is no place in Europe for one-sided provocations that deepen mistrust and sow division within the European community.

This is not merely a matter of symbolism. The impact is most acutely felt by the Slovene minority in Austria, which has long—and rightfully—voiced concern about its increasingly precarious position.

We believe that such actions by certain Austrian politicians represent a step backward. And we are convinced there are better, more constructive ways to express one’s patriotism.

Europe cannot—and must not—become an arena for competing, aggressive interpretations of the past. The European project is built on cooperation, mutual respect, and shared responsibility. Provocations that serve narrow domestic political interests at the expense of our common European future have no place in the Union—a Union founded precisely to prevent territorial ambitions and hostile nationalism from ever taking root again.

MEP Irena Joveva discussed the situation of one year after the Morocco and Qatargate scandals – a review of measures to increase transparency and accountability in the European institutions at the plenary session in Strasbourg on Wednesday, December 13th 2023. She stressed, among other things, that weak measures strengthen political forces whose only goal is self-interest.

Joveva initially warned that the two scandals in question had severely damaged the credibility of the European Union, and people had rightly lost trust.

“I actually wonder myself how much corruption is still undisclosed. How much influence, illegal lobbying, or partial interests of MPs is there? How can many in this house still receive such large sums of money for sitting on various company supervisory boards?”

Unfortunately, not much has changed in this one year, the MP added. The ethics body, which is a toothless tiger anyway, is still not functioning.

“Transparency is necessary, but it is not enough. We need a serious body with the authority to investigate all conflicts of interest, to punish all illegalities.”

Joveva went on to emphasize that these basic standards are, after all, a necessary condition for democracy. Otherwise, it seems as if everyone in politics is the same:

“We are not, but through weak measures, political forces are being strengthened whose only goal is self-interest. The Qatargate case will remain a stain on the European Union. Let us take responsibility. Let us kill corruption with decisive measures and put corrupt politicians where they belong. Behind bars.”

You can watch the full speech here.

BACKGROUND

The Qatargate affair is a corruption scandal involving allegations that the governments of Qatar, Morocco and Mauritania, through European officials and lobbyists, attempted to influence decision-making in the European Parliament in their favor. The affair was first reported in December last year, when law enforcement authorities in Belgium, Italy and Greece seized a total of $1.6 million in cash. Eight people have been arrested on charges of corruption, organized crime and money laundering. Among the eight arrested is Eva Kailli, now a former vice-president of the European Parliament, who is at the center of the affair, where the defendants are accused of trading in political influence.

The arrests were immediately followed by a series of strong condemnations in the European Union, with the European Parliament, as the Union’s legislative body, committing to introducing the necessary reforms in the fight against corruption. In January this year, the President of the European Parliament, Roberta Metsola, presented a 14-point plan to reform the European Parliament’s ethics and transparency framework. In September, Parliament adopted a number of changes aimed at strengthening integrity, independence and accountability. The adopted reforms strengthened the rules on the transparency of MEPs’ declarations of private interests, included stricter penalties for breaches of the code of conduct, provided for clearer rules on the prevention of conflicts of interest and included mandatory declarations on the disclosure of meetings with lobbyists. The new code of conduct for MEPs entered into force in November.

Photo: EP – PHILIPPE BUISSIN

Today, 15 February 2022, MEP Irena Joveva attended the Think and Speak Up! event, which addressed the issue of low levels of active citizenship among young people, one of the biggest problems facing modern democracies. She spoke with secondary school students from Gimnazija Ravne na Koroškem, and the project was organised by the IPM Academy in cooperation with Slovenian secondary schools.

During the debate, Joveva listened to the ideas of young people, who took the role of decision-makers and presented their proposals for action in the field of youth policies, with the aim of implementing the EU Youth Strategy 2021-2027. The event was also attended by the Mayor of Ravne na Koroškem, Tomaž Rožen.

Students presented ideas and solutions in three strands: sustainable green Europe and rural development, quality jobs and quality learning, and gender equality and mental health.

In the first part, students addressed the challenges in the fields of energy, investment in public transport and the need for higher taxes on polluters. In the area of development steps for rural youth, they highlighted, among other things, the desire for better transport infrastructure, modernisation of schools and active state support for local farmers.

In response to their suggestions, the MEP described the measures proposed by the students as very realistic, noting that most of them are already being implemented. She introduced the students to the European Green Deal and the 2050 climate neutrality target, and explained the importance of the taxonomy or classification of green investments, pointing out that despite the inclusion of nuclear energy in the taxonomy, the future lies in truly green investments such as wind and solar energy. She spoke about a cross-border carbon mechanism which would ensure that also non-EU producers pay for pollution, and touched on the Recovery and Resilience Fund, the Common Agricultural Policy and the importance of digitisation.

In the second strand, young people focused on quality jobs and quality learning. They proposed setting up non-formal learning communities at the local level. In addition, they stressed the importance of creating more jobs for young people and the need for fair pay and payment for overtime.

The MEP commented that the areas of education and employment are most effectively regulated at local and national level, as they fall under the competence of the Member States. She supports the idea of the young that holiday work and work placements could also count towards years of service. A related topical issue, she pointed out, is an amendment to the EU Youth Strategy that would ban unpaid work placements, which is expected to be adopted this week in the EP Plenary. She also touched on the minimum wage and the problem of precarious work, stressing that the key solution in this respect lies with employers.

In the final strand, students focused on gender equality and mental health and well-being. Most of them agreed that the ubiquitous stigma and stereotypes associated with this topic are still a major problem.

“What is needed is a change to the mindset. And this will happen with the next generations.”

Concluding her remarks, the MEP assured the young audience that she understood that politicians often get on their nerves, but impressed upon them that this is not always justified, because not everyone is the same, and she therefore disapproved of generalisations. She thanked the participants for their suggestions and the solutions they offered and encouraged them to remain active and curious.