On Wednesday, June 18, 2025, Member of the European Parliament Irena Joveva participated in the European Parliament’s plenary debate on halting the genocide in Gaza and the possibility of EU sanctions. “Finally. With the title of this debate, this chamber is officially acknowledging what some of us have been saying for years. What is happening in Gaza is genocide,” she declared.

In her address, Joveva took a hard line against those who, despite daily reports of atrocities, continue to justify Israel’s actions or ignore the international community’s responsibility to halt the genocide:

“Those of you who still refuse to see it, who continue to hide behind courts or legal technicalities, are not just complicit. You are shameless hypocrites. You are undermining the very legal foundations you so proudly claim to defend.”

She also condemned the political manipulation and distraction tactics surrounding Israel’s attacks on Iran—launched, notably, just as domestic and international pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was mounting.

“A coincidence, is it? /…/ And then some still dare to speak of Israel’s right to self-defense ‘in this context.’ What context? The Israeli army is shooting at people standing in line for food. These are not stray bullets in the fog of war. This is deliberate, cold, calculated. Even the little humanitarian aid that makes it through is being turned into a deadly weapon.”

In light of all this, Joveva issued a clear and urgent call for decisive EU action.

“Stop. Do not be complicit. Impose sanctions on Israel. If you don’t, you continue to support genocide. If only one side has an army, equipment, and weapons… this is not a war. This is a massacre.”

 

On Tuesday, June 17, 2025, Member of the European Parliament Irena Joveva took part in a plenary session of the European Parliament during a debate on the growing threat of instability in the Middle East following escalating Israeli-Iranian military tensions, the review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, and the genocide in Gaza. Joveva made a pointed statement during the session: “It is painfully clear who poses the greatest threat to the stability of the Middle East.”

“The Middle East is torn by conflict. Genocide. Suffering. Injustice—not driven by ancient rivalries, but by ongoing impunity, military aggression, and systematic denial of human rights.”

With these words, Joveva opened her address, continuing with a firm denunciation of Israel’s sustained attacks on Gaza, its devastating strikes on Lebanon, and its increasingly aggressive posture across the region. She stressed that these actions do not constitute legitimate self-defense, but are part of a deliberate pattern aimed at destabilizing the region.

Amid rising tensions with Iran, Joveva also highlighted the harmful role of the United States, particularly that of the Trump administration, whose aggressive rhetoric she said was further inflaming an already volatile situation.

She went on to call out the double standards of those who continue to justify such armed aggression under the pretext of self-defense, despite clear evidence pointing to who truly threatens regional stability. To them, she had a direct message:

“If the European Union truly wants peaceful and diplomatic solutions, then it is long past time to draw the line against this aggressor—starting with suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement and enforcing the rulings of the International Criminal Court. Immediately.”

On 7 February, MEP Irena Joveva (Svoboda/Renew) took part in a debate on the need to combat the growing anti-Semitism and hatred of Muslims at the plenary session in Strasbourg. ”Yes, anti-Semitism is on the rise. And yes, anti-Islamism is on the rise.”

Let’s be honest and say both. Let’s also honestly say why. Because of the escalation of the situation in Gaza. Because of the war in Gaza. Because of the genocide that Israel has been carrying out against the Palestinian people for at least four months.

But although it is triggered like a tsunami after an earthquake, it is actually a deep-rooted structural racism based on hatred. Unfortunately. Hatred is like a virus and spreads like an epidemic. It also brings violence, hate crimes, revenge on religious or ethical grounds into our society. Their manifestation is further accelerated by social networks, which enable online attacks, the spread of conspiracy theories and disinformation. All of the above has no place in modern society.

And it saddens me that it is precisely on the basis of such horrific acts that radical right-wing political parties thrive and grow, even though it is precisely we – politicians – who must lead by example, teach and direct the moral and value positions of people. A patriot is NOT someone who demonstrates this by hating others.

You can watch the full video here.

Photo: EP – Alexis HAULOT

On 6 February, MEP Irena Joveva (Renew Europe/Svoboda) took part in the debate on Russian interference in democratic processes in the European Union at the plenary session in Strasbourg. ”We cannot pretend that foreign interference in our democratic processes does not exist,” the MEP stressed in her address.

Among other things, the MEP expressed deep concern over reports of espionage against one of her MEPs. Joveva stressed the need for the European Parliament to treat the matter extremely seriously and expressed the hope that a thorough investigation would be followed by concrete measures by the competent institutions.

Nevertheless, she warned that MEPs should not deny the fact that foreign interference in democratic processes in the European Union is real.

”And the methods for doing so are increasingly sophisticated. Today’s debate is the result of information about the influence of Russian secret services on one of our colleagues, but the problem is much bigger.”

Joveva reminded those present of the Ibiza scandal, when the then leader of the Austrian Free Democrats was secretly filmed. Among similar cases, the MP also highlighted Russian loans to the French National Front Marine Le Pen, as well as reports from American intelligence agencies stating that Russia has spent at least 300 million dollars on financing various political parties around the world.

According to the MP, these controversial practices are still happening, but they do not originate only from Russia. The MP is also concerned by the fact that far-right parties are the most susceptible to these practices. As the MP emphasized, ironically, it is precisely the most nationalistic parties that are willing to act even against their own national interests.

The MP concluded her speech with a call for clarification and the setting of at least minimum standards to prevent such practices.

BACKGROUND

On January 29, the Russian investigative newspaper The Insider revealed that Latvian MEP Tatjana Zhdanoka had been working with the Russian FSB intelligence service for two decades. The officer cited emails between Zhdanoka and two Russian officials that allegedly contained detailed reports about her work in the European Parliament, particularly in terms of promoting pro-Russian sentiment in the Baltic region. Zhdanoka, who is currently an unaffiliated MEP, strongly denies the newspaper’s claims of working with the intelligence service. Her former Green/EFA political group has also launched an investigation into the allegations against Zhdanoka. Zhdanoka was also among the 13 MEPs who voted against a resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in March 2022.

You can watch the full video here.

Photo: EP – Alexis HAULOT

On Tuesday, 6 February 2024, MEP Irena Joveva addressed the participants of the international event ”Gender Mainstreaming in the European Union” in Novo mesto, which took place as part of a wider project for women’s equality. In her address, the MEP highlighted the ambitious goals set by both the European Commission and the European Parliament in their efforts to achieve greater gender equality in the Union. ”Achieving true gender equality is not a sprint, but a marathon made up of small steps,” the MEP said.

As she stressed, every step that society takes is a step closer to a fairer future for all genders, and especially for children. Only an environment in which every individual can develop to their full potential, regardless of gender, will create a world of equal opportunities for all:

”Although the path to gender equality is fraught with many obstacles, it is precisely the joint commitment of the various stakeholders involved, and above all the diverse civil society initiatives such as yours, that are essential for the development of breakthrough policies regarding the emancipation of women in all aspects of society.”

Meanwhile, the MEP is saddened by the fact that the Union is still faced with situations where women receive lower pay than their male colleagues for the same work. As she explained further, the European Parliament adopted new legislation last year for wage transparency, the publication of gender-neutral job titles and the possibility of penalties for those employers who violate these rules.

In addition to eliminating the gender pay gap, one of the priorities for MP Joveva is to promote the representation of women in decision-making bodies. As she stressed, she advocates for women’s voices to be equally recognized and taken into account in both the political and business spheres. As an important achievement, the MP mentioned the adoption of the 2022 directive, which aims to have at least 40% of non-executive directorships in companies held by the underrepresented gender by June 2026.

“Since boards of directors are traditionally dominated by men, this directive will finally give women a fair chance to rise to the top of companies. The criterion of competence in the selection process will now be more important than ever.”

The MEP sees gender quotas, which are often the subject of debate, as a powerful tool for ensuring gender equality in the political arena. She highlighted the fact that women make up more than half of the population of the entire European Union, yet men still hold a two-thirds majority of seats in national parliaments.

“Advocating for quotas is not a compromise on meritocracy, but a recognition that talent, ability and leadership qualities are not specific to one gender.”

In the concluding part of her speech, the MEP recalled that she is also striving for improvements in the area of inequality because of her own experiences, which have encouraged her to be even more active in advocating for change as an MEP.

”In my youth, I witnessed gender discrimination in my late mother’s case. Later in life, I experienced it myself, although in a less cruel way. Now I have a daughter. And I wish with all my heart that she would not have to witness, endure or feel the cruelty that comes from gender inequality. Or, to be more realistic, I wish at least that she would feel it much less than we did and still do. I hope that we will reach a point where character, good work and results count, not gender.”

Dear youth,

I believe that you have all already fully stepped into the year 2024. Just like us.

The first plenary session of the year, where I spoke about the state of media freedom in Greece, is behind us. A country that is historically known as the cradle of democracy, but today, unfortunately, is anything but that. That is why I am not silent and that is why we must monitor the implementation of European media legislation there as well. Because I do not want the cradle of democracy to become its graveyard.

On the day when South Africa presented its arguments in its lawsuit against Israel, I publicly announced that I had addressed letters to the authorities at the European Commission with specific questions and demands. They have six weeks to respond. Because I want the EU as a totality to have as much political power, to call Israel’s actions in Gaza by their right name. THIS. IS. GENOCIDE.

You also know about my efforts for Slovenian in the digital world. It may sometimes seem as if nothing is happening, but that is not true. Unfortunately, it is moving slowly, but now I have come to terms with the procedures in the European institutions, because … it is better to start and persist than to do nothing, right? It is moving, it really is. The two competent European Commissioners have responded to my letter regarding the need to revise the European Directive on Audiovisual Media Services. They assured me that they will be happy to include me in further procedures, and thanks to their response, we now have a piece of paper: the ban on linguistic discrimination WILL be legally established at the European level. Because I want our mother tongue to be respected as it deserves.

Yes, the European elections are just around the corner, but I prefer to direct my energy towards what I can still do through my work. For you. My will to work has not and will not change – regardless of the period (before the elections) we are in. Because, you know … we are not all the same.

Irena

On Wednesday, 17 January 2024, MEP Irena Joveva (Freedom/Renew) took part in the debate on the rule of law and media freedom in Greece at the plenary session in Strasbourg. In her introduction, the MEP recalled that Greece is historically known as the cradle of democracy, but today, unfortunately, the country is “in a completely different light”.

As she pointed out, media freedom in Greece is strongly influenced by deep-rooted systemic obstacles, which stem, among other things, from the lack of media pluralism and the oligarchic ownership structure of media houses that dictate the editorial policy of the media, which consequently also leads to self-censorship:

“The murder of journalist Giorgos Karaivaz remains unsolved. Journalists are facing numerous legal proceedings. Unfounded. In order to silence them.”

According to Joveva, all of the above creates obstacles to independent and critical reporting. The MEP is concerned that at a time when the European level is setting standards for resolving situations such as those in Greece through the Media Freedom Act, the Greek government is proposing a law that would increase prison sentences for journalists.

“That is why we must not remain silent. We must monitor the implementation of European media legislation in Greece. We must fight to ensure that the cradle of democracy does not also become its graveyard,” she concluded.

The resolution on the state of the rule of law and media freedom in Greece is expected to be approved by MEPs at the first plenary session in February.

You can watch the full video here.

BACKGROUND

The past few years have seen a marked deterioration in media freedom in Greece, which has led the Mediterranean country to fall to the bottom of the European Union’s press freedom rankings. This worrying situation, which coincides with the rise to power of the centre-right New Democracy party, has also raised alarms in Brussels. The country was rocked in recent years by the murder of Giorgos Karaivaz, an investigative journalist who reported on links between the Greek criminal underworld and allegedly corrupt police officers.

While Karaivaz’s murder was the most glaring example of the deterioration in the safety of journalists, the media freedom situation has also deteriorated due to a lack of media pluralism, political interference in the independence of the media and the concentration of media ownership in the hands of wealthy oligarchs. This trend poses a serious threat not only to media freedom in Greece, but is also a cause for concern at European level.

Is it better to do nothing than to start something? And to persevere.

“We share your goal of protecting linguistic diversity. We will also carefully consider the issue you raised as part of the evaluation process, and we will be happy to continue to work with you to resolve it.”

In the paragraph above, you read the essence of the response of the authorities, Vice-President of the European Commission Vera Jourova and European Commissioner Thierry Breton, to my appeal to amend European legislation so that we finally – systematically and explicitly – ban linguistic discrimination.

You know that I’ve been working for a long time to ensure that all multinationals operating in the European Union market begin to respect the equality of the official languages of that same market, but it’s more than obvious that this won’t work without legal coercion.

I therefore certainly welcome the fact that the European Commission, with whom I have been in discussions (and agreements) for some time on how to legally resolve this problem, will examine my proposals for the revision of the European Audiovisual Media Services Directive. I also appreciate the willingness of the Vice-President and the Commissioner to involve me in the further procedures.

It is precisely because of their response that we now have the black and white: the ban on linguistic discrimination WILL be legislated at the European level. Many of you are asking me why it hasn’t been yet. Rightly so, but unfortunately the European legislative process is taking a looooong time. And unfortunately I can’t influence it as much as I would like. But…

…is it really better to do nothing than to start something? And to persevere. And believe me, I will.

The letter, which – including the remaining details – you can find here, is a very clear signal from the highest level of the European Union executive that … it is possible.

– Irena

On Friday, January 12, 2024, MEP Irena Joveva received a response from the Vice-President of the European Commission, Commissioner for Values and Transparency Vera Jourová, and the Commissioner for the Internal Market Thierry Breton, to her public letter calling for a revision of the European Directive on Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS Directive) by supplementing or extending the obligations for platforms offering (streaming) video content in Member States to translate subtitles or dubbing into all official languages of the European Union.

In a personal response to MEP Joveva, Vice-President Jourova and Commissioner Breton stressed that they share her goal of protecting linguistic diversity and are working towards this through a number of funding initiatives, such as the MEDIA programme under Creative Europe and a call for a study on the possibilities of exploring different European cultural content in the digital environment.

The key emphasis of MEP Joveva’s letter was that the aforementioned directive needs to be revised, which should also include provisions on respecting linguistic diversity, or extending the principle of non-discrimination to all audiovisual content, and that accessibility requirements for citizens through subtitling or dubbing should apply to all Europeans. Vice-President Jourova and Commissioner Breton stated that cultural and linguistic diversity remain the competence of the Member States, but at the same time assured that the European Commission would carefully examine Irene Joveva’s question and proposals as part of the evaluation process, and that they would also be “happy to involve her in the procedures”.

Upon receiving the letter, the MEP said:

“I am positively surprised that the two responsible Commissioners have taken such a thorough and individual approach to resolving the issue that I raised in my appeal. The European legislative process is indeed lengthy, but it is a very clear signal from the highest level of the EU executive, which could also mean that these companies are finally taking on the task of resolving this problem independently, i.e. before we make this an obligation at the level of the entire Union with the revision of the AVMSD. Slovenia has already taken a decisive step with the currently planned amendments to the Act on the Public Use of the Slovenian Language, but unfortunately this will not bring the desired solutions for video streaming content providers such as Netflix or Disney+, because due to the observance of the so-called country of origin principle, these companies in the EU fall directly and exclusively under the jurisdiction of the regulators in the countries where they are registered. The problem will be partially solved by adopting the recently agreed European Media Freedom Act, which will contain an article on the coordination of regulators of the Member States, which I sincerely hope will encourage the Slovenian regulator to make an appeal to regulators of other countries to respect linguistic diversity, i.e. to subtitling and synchronizing content into our native language, Slovenian. I have been trying for a long time to get these companies to do this independently, but due to their (too) slow responses, I am now trying to make these principles legally binding. I am convinced that the principle of non-discrimination on the basis of language should also be taken into account by private companies that offer their services in Slovenia and other EU member states. At a time when the Internet represents an increasingly large part of our lives, we must strive for equality for all European languages. This is a right that is imposed, among other things, by the fundamental treaties of the EU. I argue that subtitling and synchronizing content in the Slovenian language is necessary to prevent such discrimination, but at the same time I point out that languages on the Internet are also unequal in other areas, for example in the moderation of content and other provisions of the recently adopted legislation, the Digital Services Act. The aspect of language equality is also often overlooked in EU legislation and it is time to correct these injustices.”

We are also attaching the original letter in English and Slovenian for your reading.

What the state of Israel is doing, especially in Gaza, is being described by many as genocide. Can a person disagree with this? I find that hard to believe.

In late December, South Africa took a historic step by documenting the allegations of genocide in an 84-page report, which was then submitted to the International Court of Justice in The Hague.

South Africa also bases its accusations against Israel of genocide and the destruction of a significant portion of the Palestinian ethnic group in the broader context of apartheid – an institutionalized regime of oppression – and the dominance of one racial group over another. And honestly, who else understands apartheid better?

Despite the Israeli regime’s persistent claims that it is acting solely in self-defense in response to the Hamas terrorist attack of October 7 (which I have repeatedly condemned and continue to condemn, and will always do, to be clear), this in no way justifies the crimes that we have all witnessed on a daily basis for months. Even less can it justify the institutional segregation to which Palestinians have been subjected for 77 years, including 56 years of Israeli military occupation of the Palestinian territories and 16 years of total blockade of Gaza.

It will therefore be important that the International Court of Justice, even before the final verdict (which will probably take some time), takes immediate interim measures to halt the Israeli offensive in Gaza and the associated forced displacement of its residents, and to order access to humanitarian aid for the Palestinian people.

Therefore, today, on the day that South Africa presents its arguments against Israel at the Peace Palace, I am publicly announcing that I have sent two letters to the European Commission and the High Representative Josep Borrell with strong political pressure in the form of parliamentary questions, to which they are obliged to give me a written answer within six weeks of the handover, in accordance with Article 138 of the Rules of Procedure.

I demand further steps from the European Union in relation to Israel’s actions, I ask for a consistent response from the community.

Will the European Commission, as the EU body responsible for implementing the treaties, examine the validity of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, which is based on respect for human rights and democratic principles (Article 2), which are being openly violated in Gaza?

In the face of the increasing violence in the West Bank, will the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, propose the introduction of a visa ban for residents of illegal Israeli settlements in the European Union? Does the High Representative intend to submit to the Council of the European Union a freeze on the assets of Israeli settlers and a ban on all trade between the EU and illegal Israeli settlements?

What steps does the High Representative or the EU intend to take towards an immediate cessation of hostilities, the establishment of humanitarian corridors, a return to the peace process and the preparation of a peace plan that will lead to the establishment of a Palestinian state and its international recognition by all EU Member States?

Does the EU intend to ban companies from EU Member States from trading with companies operating in these settlements?

If not, why the hell not? If yes, for God’s sake, when?!

In accordance with my powers, I will of course continue to raise my voice. I will continue to closely monitor developments, keep you regularly informed about my activities, and continue to strive for the inalienable right of the Palestinian people TOO to live a normal and dignified life in THEIR territory.

– Irena