On Tuesday, June 17, 2025, Member of the European Parliament Irena Joveva took part in a plenary session of the European Parliament during a debate on the growing threat of instability in the Middle East following escalating Israeli-Iranian military tensions, the review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, and the genocide in Gaza. Joveva made a pointed statement during the session: “It is painfully clear who poses the greatest threat to the stability of the Middle East.”

“The Middle East is torn by conflict. Genocide. Suffering. Injustice—not driven by ancient rivalries, but by ongoing impunity, military aggression, and systematic denial of human rights.”

With these words, Joveva opened her address, continuing with a firm denunciation of Israel’s sustained attacks on Gaza, its devastating strikes on Lebanon, and its increasingly aggressive posture across the region. She stressed that these actions do not constitute legitimate self-defense, but are part of a deliberate pattern aimed at destabilizing the region.

Amid rising tensions with Iran, Joveva also highlighted the harmful role of the United States, particularly that of the Trump administration, whose aggressive rhetoric she said was further inflaming an already volatile situation.

She went on to call out the double standards of those who continue to justify such armed aggression under the pretext of self-defense, despite clear evidence pointing to who truly threatens regional stability. To them, she had a direct message:

“If the European Union truly wants peaceful and diplomatic solutions, then it is long past time to draw the line against this aggressor—starting with suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement and enforcing the rulings of the International Criminal Court. Immediately.”

On Wednesday, 17 January 2024, MEP Irena Joveva (Freedom/Renew) took part in the debate on the rule of law and media freedom in Greece at the plenary session in Strasbourg. In her introduction, the MEP recalled that Greece is historically known as the cradle of democracy, but today, unfortunately, the country is “in a completely different light”.

As she pointed out, media freedom in Greece is strongly influenced by deep-rooted systemic obstacles, which stem, among other things, from the lack of media pluralism and the oligarchic ownership structure of media houses that dictate the editorial policy of the media, which consequently also leads to self-censorship:

“The murder of journalist Giorgos Karaivaz remains unsolved. Journalists are facing numerous legal proceedings. Unfounded. In order to silence them.”

According to Joveva, all of the above creates obstacles to independent and critical reporting. The MEP is concerned that at a time when the European level is setting standards for resolving situations such as those in Greece through the Media Freedom Act, the Greek government is proposing a law that would increase prison sentences for journalists.

“That is why we must not remain silent. We must monitor the implementation of European media legislation in Greece. We must fight to ensure that the cradle of democracy does not also become its graveyard,” she concluded.

The resolution on the state of the rule of law and media freedom in Greece is expected to be approved by MEPs at the first plenary session in February.

You can watch the full video here.

BACKGROUND

The past few years have seen a marked deterioration in media freedom in Greece, which has led the Mediterranean country to fall to the bottom of the European Union’s press freedom rankings. This worrying situation, which coincides with the rise to power of the centre-right New Democracy party, has also raised alarms in Brussels. The country was rocked in recent years by the murder of Giorgos Karaivaz, an investigative journalist who reported on links between the Greek criminal underworld and allegedly corrupt police officers.

While Karaivaz’s murder was the most glaring example of the deterioration in the safety of journalists, the media freedom situation has also deteriorated due to a lack of media pluralism, political interference in the independence of the media and the concentration of media ownership in the hands of wealthy oligarchs. This trend poses a serious threat not only to media freedom in Greece, but is also a cause for concern at European level.

Is it better to do nothing than to start something? And to persevere.

“We share your goal of protecting linguistic diversity. We will also carefully consider the issue you raised as part of the evaluation process, and we will be happy to continue to work with you to resolve it.”

In the paragraph above, you read the essence of the response of the authorities, Vice-President of the European Commission Vera Jourova and European Commissioner Thierry Breton, to my appeal to amend European legislation so that we finally – systematically and explicitly – ban linguistic discrimination.

You know that I’ve been working for a long time to ensure that all multinationals operating in the European Union market begin to respect the equality of the official languages of that same market, but it’s more than obvious that this won’t work without legal coercion.

I therefore certainly welcome the fact that the European Commission, with whom I have been in discussions (and agreements) for some time on how to legally resolve this problem, will examine my proposals for the revision of the European Audiovisual Media Services Directive. I also appreciate the willingness of the Vice-President and the Commissioner to involve me in the further procedures.

It is precisely because of their response that we now have the black and white: the ban on linguistic discrimination WILL be legislated at the European level. Many of you are asking me why it hasn’t been yet. Rightly so, but unfortunately the European legislative process is taking a looooong time. And unfortunately I can’t influence it as much as I would like. But…

…is it really better to do nothing than to start something? And to persevere. And believe me, I will.

The letter, which – including the remaining details – you can find here, is a very clear signal from the highest level of the European Union executive that … it is possible.

– Irena

On Friday, January 12, 2024, MEP Irena Joveva received a response from the Vice-President of the European Commission, Commissioner for Values and Transparency Vera Jourová, and the Commissioner for the Internal Market Thierry Breton, to her public letter calling for a revision of the European Directive on Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS Directive) by supplementing or extending the obligations for platforms offering (streaming) video content in Member States to translate subtitles or dubbing into all official languages of the European Union.

In a personal response to MEP Joveva, Vice-President Jourova and Commissioner Breton stressed that they share her goal of protecting linguistic diversity and are working towards this through a number of funding initiatives, such as the MEDIA programme under Creative Europe and a call for a study on the possibilities of exploring different European cultural content in the digital environment.

The key emphasis of MEP Joveva’s letter was that the aforementioned directive needs to be revised, which should also include provisions on respecting linguistic diversity, or extending the principle of non-discrimination to all audiovisual content, and that accessibility requirements for citizens through subtitling or dubbing should apply to all Europeans. Vice-President Jourova and Commissioner Breton stated that cultural and linguistic diversity remain the competence of the Member States, but at the same time assured that the European Commission would carefully examine Irene Joveva’s question and proposals as part of the evaluation process, and that they would also be “happy to involve her in the procedures”.

Upon receiving the letter, the MEP said:

“I am positively surprised that the two responsible Commissioners have taken such a thorough and individual approach to resolving the issue that I raised in my appeal. The European legislative process is indeed lengthy, but it is a very clear signal from the highest level of the EU executive, which could also mean that these companies are finally taking on the task of resolving this problem independently, i.e. before we make this an obligation at the level of the entire Union with the revision of the AVMSD. Slovenia has already taken a decisive step with the currently planned amendments to the Act on the Public Use of the Slovenian Language, but unfortunately this will not bring the desired solutions for video streaming content providers such as Netflix or Disney+, because due to the observance of the so-called country of origin principle, these companies in the EU fall directly and exclusively under the jurisdiction of the regulators in the countries where they are registered. The problem will be partially solved by adopting the recently agreed European Media Freedom Act, which will contain an article on the coordination of regulators of the Member States, which I sincerely hope will encourage the Slovenian regulator to make an appeal to regulators of other countries to respect linguistic diversity, i.e. to subtitling and synchronizing content into our native language, Slovenian. I have been trying for a long time to get these companies to do this independently, but due to their (too) slow responses, I am now trying to make these principles legally binding. I am convinced that the principle of non-discrimination on the basis of language should also be taken into account by private companies that offer their services in Slovenia and other EU member states. At a time when the Internet represents an increasingly large part of our lives, we must strive for equality for all European languages. This is a right that is imposed, among other things, by the fundamental treaties of the EU. I argue that subtitling and synchronizing content in the Slovenian language is necessary to prevent such discrimination, but at the same time I point out that languages on the Internet are also unequal in other areas, for example in the moderation of content and other provisions of the recently adopted legislation, the Digital Services Act. The aspect of language equality is also often overlooked in EU legislation and it is time to correct these injustices.”

We are also attaching the original letter in English and Slovenian for your reading.

What the state of Israel is doing, especially in Gaza, is being described by many as genocide. Can a person disagree with this? I find that hard to believe.

In late December, South Africa took a historic step by documenting the allegations of genocide in an 84-page report, which was then submitted to the International Court of Justice in The Hague.

South Africa also bases its accusations against Israel of genocide and the destruction of a significant portion of the Palestinian ethnic group in the broader context of apartheid – an institutionalized regime of oppression – and the dominance of one racial group over another. And honestly, who else understands apartheid better?

Despite the Israeli regime’s persistent claims that it is acting solely in self-defense in response to the Hamas terrorist attack of October 7 (which I have repeatedly condemned and continue to condemn, and will always do, to be clear), this in no way justifies the crimes that we have all witnessed on a daily basis for months. Even less can it justify the institutional segregation to which Palestinians have been subjected for 77 years, including 56 years of Israeli military occupation of the Palestinian territories and 16 years of total blockade of Gaza.

It will therefore be important that the International Court of Justice, even before the final verdict (which will probably take some time), takes immediate interim measures to halt the Israeli offensive in Gaza and the associated forced displacement of its residents, and to order access to humanitarian aid for the Palestinian people.

Therefore, today, on the day that South Africa presents its arguments against Israel at the Peace Palace, I am publicly announcing that I have sent two letters to the European Commission and the High Representative Josep Borrell with strong political pressure in the form of parliamentary questions, to which they are obliged to give me a written answer within six weeks of the handover, in accordance with Article 138 of the Rules of Procedure.

I demand further steps from the European Union in relation to Israel’s actions, I ask for a consistent response from the community.

Will the European Commission, as the EU body responsible for implementing the treaties, examine the validity of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, which is based on respect for human rights and democratic principles (Article 2), which are being openly violated in Gaza?

In the face of the increasing violence in the West Bank, will the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, propose the introduction of a visa ban for residents of illegal Israeli settlements in the European Union? Does the High Representative intend to submit to the Council of the European Union a freeze on the assets of Israeli settlers and a ban on all trade between the EU and illegal Israeli settlements?

What steps does the High Representative or the EU intend to take towards an immediate cessation of hostilities, the establishment of humanitarian corridors, a return to the peace process and the preparation of a peace plan that will lead to the establishment of a Palestinian state and its international recognition by all EU Member States?

Does the EU intend to ban companies from EU Member States from trading with companies operating in these settlements?

If not, why the hell not? If yes, for God’s sake, when?!

In accordance with my powers, I will of course continue to raise my voice. I will continue to closely monitor developments, keep you regularly informed about my activities, and continue to strive for the inalienable right of the Palestinian people TOO to live a normal and dignified life in THEIR territory.

– Irena

In the last issue of the Pen supplement of the weekly Vestnik last year, MEP Irena Joveva shared her views on the current situation of the Slovenian language in public use and discussed the possibilities for improvement. Joveva, who was among the first to warn and call for an end to discrimination against the Slovenian language by some streaming content providers on the Slovenian market, emphasized: “Respect for linguistic diversity is truly a minimum requirement that should be self-evident even without legislative coercion, but it is clear that it will not be possible otherwise.”

In this regard, the MEP wrote to the CEOs of Amazon Prime, Disney+ and Netflix in 2022, and warned of linguistic discrimination and violations of Slovenian legislation at one of the plenary sessions of the European Parliament. Although she met with representatives of most companies, Joveva reminded the journalist that none of them had shown motivation to solve the problems related to the non-use of one of the official languages of the European Union, even though they are doing very well on the Union market.

“The statements, which implied, among other things, that it was not financially worthwhile for them, were unacceptable. I myself made it clear to them that I would continue to seek a solution in other ways, as it was more than obvious that the problem would have to be solved through legislative measures.”

When asked about the results of her efforts, the MEP replied that without a legally binding ban on language discrimination in the European Union market, including the digital one, we cannot expect consistent respect for the linguistic diversity of these companies.

Meanwhile, she also pointed out that the conversation with Apple representatives was somewhat more productive, but still insufficient. She therefore announced a new meeting with Apple representatives, where they will review the current situation and discuss further steps.

“Until there is a legally binding ban, instead of respecting languages and non-discrimination at any level, including linguistic, these companies will always say that they simply don’t have to do it, or they will solve the problem slowly.”

The MEP has also been actively involved in resolving issues within her remit in the European Parliament. As one of the parliamentary negotiators on behalf of her Renew Europe political group in the Committee on Culture and Education, she participated in drafting the text of the Digital Services Act, which entered into force in August last year. The legislative provision obliges online giants to take into account the language of the Member State and to employ moderators who can communicate in that country’s language.

The upcoming media freedom act, which is expected to be finally approved in the coming weeks, is also crucial for the MP. The text of the act also includes changes in the area of language discrimination and allows for cooperation between national regulators. This is extremely important for the MP, as streaming content providers often make excuses by stating that they are not based in Slovenia.

“We want to regulate this with two articles on the coordination of national regulators in the European Media Freedom Act, but for successful implementation and systemic resolution of the issue, we will also have to amend the Audiovisual Media Services Directive.”

Although the existing Audiovisual Media Services Directive already requires compliance with the principle of non-discrimination in commercial communications on grounds of sex, ethnicity, religion, age or sexual orientation, Joveva explained that the already enshrined principle of non-discrimination should also be extended to prohibit linguistic discrimination.

In order to achieve these goals, the MEP, in a public appeal to the European Commission, highlighted the importance of including an explicit prohibition of linguistic discrimination in this directive, and discussions on implementing this amendment are already in full swing.

”At a time when the Internet is an increasingly important part of our lives, we must all work together to ensure the equality of all languages in the European Union, as this is essential for their survival and continued existence, including Slovenian. The legislative process in the Union is usually long-lasting, but this does not mean that we can sit idly by and wait forever for multinationals, who will not do much without concrete pressure, especially legislative pressure.”

text by Maja Hajdinjak

Published in Vestnik: 28.12.2023

Photo: Anže Petkovšek

12 plenary sessions. 21 plenary speeches. Hours and hours of voting, meetings, debates. Finding compromises. Insisting on things that I knew had to stay or be accepted in the texts. Dozens of amendments and appeals tabled or co-signed. No less important coordination within committees and in the framework of trilogues, which often dragged on late into the night …

…and another calendar year has passed. I hope you had a great time celebrating the start of a new one. I am opening these doors for another year, more experienced, but no less driven. I remain firmly grounded, while remaining true to my principles, to myself, and – to you.

I became Vice-Chair of the Subcommittee on Public Health. For the first time in the European Parliament, we really, honestly and loudly spoke about the importance of mental health, and advocated for the elimination of stigma and the promotion of the normalization of help-seeking in our society.

I was appointed as the Parliament’s lead rapporteur for the revision of the legislation on population and housing statistics. As rapporteur for my political group, I also played a significant role in shaping the European Media Freedom Act. In the adopted text, we stipulated for the first time at EU level that Member States should not interfere in editorial policy. The act also ensures sufficient and predictable funding for public media and measures against surveillance of journalists.

I continued – and continue! – to fight against discrimination against the Slovenian language in the digital world. I met with representatives of multinationals, addressed a written question to the European Commission regarding discrimination against the official languages of the Union, initiated negotiations with them on the revision of the relevant European legislation, and participated in the Culture Committee of the National Assembly, where I received unanimous support for my efforts in this area.

With combined efforts of my Renew Europe political group and the challenging search for compromises within the European Parliament, we have voted and adopted important measures for the future of the Union, sometimes with only a narrow majority.

Achievements in the field of the environment include the Nature Restoration Act, which will cover at least 20 percent of land and sea areas, the Renewable Energy Directive, and the establishment of a carbon border adjustment mechanism.

The only predictability of nature is its unpredictability. This summer we experienced the worst natural disaster in the history of Slovenia. With the European Union Solidarity Fund, we provided money for the reconstruction of critical infrastructure.

We have taken steps to reduce the use of plastic. I know that some measures are annoying many people in their daily lives, but in this case, something is better than nothing. Unless we really want seas of plastic instead of animals in them. Truth be told, we are already not that far from that. With the Packaging Regulation, we intend to reduce the amount of packaging and encourage the reuse of materials.

As regards job creation, I was actively involved as one of the parliamentary negotiators in the adoption of the report on job creation for a just transition, which aims to transform existing jobs into green and sustainable jobs. We voted on the Pay Transparency Directive and the Platform Workers Directive, which will – I hope – contribute to creating safer working conditions for many workers.

In the field of culture, I was one of the parliamentary negotiators when it came to the social and professional situation of artists in the cultural sector. We confirmed their position with the legislative framework, as they need to establish (at least) minimum standards for working conditions.

When it comes to consumer rights, we have taken the necessary steps. By introducing the right to repair, repairs will be more affordable compared to buying new goods.

We have actively sought more opportunities for young people. In the report on the implementation of the European Solidarity Corps programme, as one of the negotiators, I called for more engagement when it comes to young people, following the principle of nothing about young people without young people. I advocated for an increase in funding for the programme in question, as well as for the Erasmus+ and Creative Europe programmes.

With the legislative resolution on quality inernships, we have finally (!!!) put an end to unpaid internships for young people. We have called on the Commission to propose a directive on quality internships, which will ensure adequate compensation for interns. I push the boundaries where I can, which is why last year we continued the practice of paid internships in our office, giving five young people a multi-month internship experience that will be very useful when entering the competitive job market.

Meanwhile, technology is advancing at such an incredible speed that it is really difficult for a human – let alone legislation – to keep up. However, the use of artificial intelligence will now be regulated by the historic Artificial Intelligence Act, which is the first comprehensive legislation in this area in the world. With the act, we ensure safety, transparency and environmentally friendly artificial intelligence systems.

Although in the field of expansion we seem to be operating on the principle of two steps forward and one step back, the European Parliament has called on the Union to start accession negotiations with Moldova and Ukraine. The same applies to Bosnia and Herzegovina, provided that this country implements certain reforms. However, I would like to draw attention to double standards once again. At the November meeting between MEPs and members of the Macedonian Parliament, I stressed that North Macedonia in particular, as well as the Western Balkans in general, deserve a better fate. And a fair, honest relationship.

Throughout the year, I spoke about my work and current European issues and opportunities for young people with young people from Domžale, Kranj, Ljubljana, Logatec, Murska Sobota, Nova Gorica, Novo Mesto, Portorož, Velenje. In the special “MEP Shadowing” programme, I participated in the voluntary work of learning the Slovenian language for participants from Ukraine. Through the story of a young Palestinian man whose house was invaded by the Israeli army, I took to the stage in the play “Without Hope, with Hope”, which was performed in the European Parliament.

Unfortunately, a few months later, this staging turned into an even sadder and more tragic reality on the ground. Sanctions against Israel should have been inevitable, as should the advocacy of a policy of peace. Meanwhile, the War in Ukraine entered its second year. We have been following the rise of illiberal democracies after the elections in Slovakia and the Netherlands. I do not want such a Union, such a world.

As part of my international activities, I visited Poland as part of a parliamentary delegation of the Committee on Culture and Education, where I learned about the state of the country in the field of freedom of the media, culture and education. A closer look revealed that in Poland, law and justice operate exclusively according to government criteria, led by the ironically eponymous party.

I also participated in the Internet Governance Forum meeting held in Kyoto, Japan. As a panelist, I spoke at the discussion on the fight against disinformation and hate speech.

Despite some opposition, we secured an additional, ninth Slovenian seat in the European Parliament, which will increase your representation, the representation of Slovenian citizens in the Union.

None of the above would have been possible without your valuable support. Your advice, praise, and even criticism… you are the driving force behind my efforts. That is why this year, as every year, I will make every effort to ensure that your voice is heard in the European Parliament – for you – for your and our shared, better future.

– Irena

Photo: EP/Alain Rolland

My formal education was slowly coming to an end, so I had to think about what and how to continue. Friends often encouraged me to apply for the tenders they sent me, and among them was also the one for an internship with MEP Irena Joveva at the European Parliament in Brussels. I applied.

After the selection process was completed, I received an email saying that I had been selected for one of two two-month internships in Brussels. Honestly, it was completely unexpected and I was very excited about the upcoming experience. Unexpected, especially from the perspective that I have no formal or informal experience in politics, international relations or related fields, as I have a master’s degree in economics and business. Nevertheless, I have always been interested in politics, especially in relation to the European Union. My master’s thesis was also on the topic of copyright regulation in the European Union and the Republic of Slovenia, and this internship gave me direct insight into the very heart of the process of creating certain regulatory frameworks.

On my first working day, I was met in front of the Parliament by my colleague Elma, with whom I shared an office throughout my internship. I can only speak highly of Elma, as she is a master of networking, speaking foreign languages, and an extremely knowledgeable and open person who is always ready to help. The other two members of the Brussels team, Žana and Rok, also made a big impression on me on the first day when they welcomed me so casually and then, over lunch, confidently explained to me about the documents and articles they were currently working on. Of course, I must not forget Irena, who completely breaks the stereotype of the lofty politician. Irena is relaxed, smiling, always ready to talk, and at the same time, she is maximally professional in her work. What impressed me the most is definitely her diligence in her work and how this work affects people.

The Parliament, as a building, is indeed a huge modern labyrinth, but honestly I didn’t have any major problems with orientation, as our offices were on the third floor, which is the so-called connecting floor, and therefore navigating the Parliament is so much easier.

In the first week already, I was exposed to the dynamics of work in the Parliament, as we were waiting for a “mini-plenary” lasting two days. Unlike the usual plenary week, which takes place in Strasbourg, this one takes place in Brussels. This experience was undoubtedly a welcome shock and an extremely interesting event for me. On the first day of the plenary session, actress Cate Blanchett also addressed the MEPs, which caused a real small chaos in front of the hall. Colleagues in the office even mentioned that they had not experienced such crowds since Volodymyr Zelensky’s speech.

The team made sure that I got to know all aspects of working in the Parliament, which I am very happy about, as I had the opportunity to participate in an extremely important work. I heard from fellow interns in other offices that this is not such a common practice and that interns are largely responsible for answering the phone and answering emails. Elma definitely made sure that my experience would not be similar, as she not only guided me in my daily tasks, but also guided me from one session to another, to political group meetings, events and so on. During the daily walks to the chambers, she always explained to me who the passers-by were and what they were doing, so I am not exaggerating when I say that she is a master of networking, as she knows most of the staff in the Parliament. During the sessions, she provided me with additional information on the topics under discussion and accompanied them with local wisdom, sometimes even with quotes from poems.

Entering the life and work in the Parliament also required some adjustment, as I do not have practical political experience, unlike most employees of this institution. With this in mind, I took a serious approach to reading the news every day, following daily events, so that I could follow all the events that unfolded day after day.

Brussels, the city of the “bubble”

Living in Brussels, unlike working in the Parliament, was a bit less pleasant. During the entire internship, I only saw the sun twice. We also had rain, and later it often snowed, but this kind of weather is supposed to be typical of Brussels in the autumn and winter.

What surprised me the most was the lack of organization of the municipal system in the city. Instead of dumping waste in large garbage cans, they place their garbage bags on the sidewalks and in front of apartments several times a week, which are later picked up by municipal workers. In other words, you are often accompanied by piles of garbage bags when you walk through the city.

However, the Christmas decorations, lights and the Christmas market itself are wonderful and create a magical atmosphere and fun for everyone. The city also impresses with interesting cultural attractions and museum exhibitions, which I enjoyed visiting on weekends. I visited the Royal Museum of Fine Arts of Belgium, which is huge and offers a lot of different exhibition spaces, and I also attended a few smaller exhibitions, for example the Tim Burton’s Labyrinth exhibition, which presents the director’s work in a very interesting and innovative way. I also took the time to visit the Belgian cities in the area and saw Antwerp, Ghent and Bruges. All the cities surprised me very positively, especially Ghent with its charm and a really picturesque city center. I also attended a rock concert in Brussels, so there was no shortage of free time activities during the internship itself and I really made the most of my time in Belgium.

 

 

Christmas Strasbourg

At the end of my internship, I was able to visit Strasbourg at Christmas, where we had a real plenary session. The Parliament in France is much more difficult to navigate, but it has a similar concept of a connecting floor to the Parliament in Brussels. Plenary sessions are a truly special experience, as there is a lot of work to do, as well as a huge number of events and meetings to attend. In my opinion, the hectic nature of such a week gives this job even more charm, although I personally do not understand the point of moving the entire Parliament staff to a completely different country for a week every month. At least because of the environmental impact of such a project, but it is also a huge time drain for everyone involved.

During the plenary session, we also attended a Christmas dinner, where there was enough time for a little more informal socializing and relaxation. The city of Strasbourg is famous for its large Christmas market and the beautiful decoration of the city center itself. The view of the Notre-Dame Cathedral is simply breathtaking.

I have to thank the entire team, Irena, Elma, Žana, Rok, Jasna, Marko and Samanta for all the patience and trust shown during the internship. It was an incredible experience that will serve me well for the rest of my life, as it forced me to step out of my comfort zone and face areas where I was not exactly at home. I gained a lot of new acquaintances and knowledge that I will cherish forever. At the same time, I gained an insight into the functioning of a large international institution, which is invaluable.

– Matevž Mandl

Unity, perseverance, freedom. Three words that are not only an echo of the past, but also the outline of our future.

On Independence and Unity Day, we remember the day when the Slovenian people clearly expressed their will for their country in a plebiscite. A turning point more than three decades ago, when we as a nation chose our own path. Our path.

No one said it would be easy, but along the way we’ve never lost our identity, culture, or language. Patriots excluded, of course.

Otherwise, it was the pride, identity, culture and language that strengthened the Slovenian nation throughout the history and gave it perseverance, which is what has kept this nation standing and surviving all these years.

The independence and freedom that we won three decades ago should by no means be something that we can take for granted today, when we have our own country.

Today is a day, that carries a broader meaning than just remembering the beginnings of our country. It is also an opportunity to look to the future and reflect on the kind of society we want to live in and the country we want to help create.

It is up to all of us, to not give up on the path to an even more inclusive, successful and united Slovenia.

Good luck, dear Slovenia!

Historic white smoke! We did it!

“‘There’s no way you’re going to get this done in this term.'” We’ve been hearing that for over a year. I’ve thought about it myself many times. I admit it.

There were attempts to demolish it from all sides. There were rebellions. There were disputes about who was responsible for what. There was drama. A lot of drama. But… reason won. Remember the Renew Europe team in this photo, who did everything and more so that after a whole day of final interinstitutional negotiations I can write to you: we have reached a political agreement on the final text of the European Media Freedom Act!

Democracy cannot function without free, critical and professional journalism. I really can’t describe my current feelings. I’m so pleased that with this legislation we are also recognizing this role of the media at the European Union level.

We know from experience that the media are constantly under pressure from political subordination, private (or business) interests or state restrictions on their activities. In the European Union, specifically the competent European Commission, they could only be “concerned” when serious violations occurred. There was no legal basis for concrete measures. Now, with this legislation, there will be.

The media has been given a special place on the market, a special place on the Internet, and journalists have been given special protection against espionage, against interference with editorial freedom, against attempts at political takeover. The content of the law is very good. Of course, also because I managed to include many of my proposals in it.

The final official confirmation will follow in the first half of next year. Thanks in particular to Rok and Joanna for their patience, determination and persistence in the endlessly long technical meetings, and of course also to my colleague from the Civil Liberties Committee (who had a say in part of the text) Ramona and her colleague Gabriel. Together we made it.

And to all you who read and follow me, greetings from Brussels!

– Irena