On 2 September 2025, MEP Irena Joveva participated in the panel Europe Chooses – creating unity or facing fragmentation at the Bled Strategic Forum, where she and other interlocutors discussed the future of the European Union in an increasingly divided world.

In her introduction, Joveva stressed that the work in this mandate is particularly challenging due to the rise of populism and the return of dangerous ideas that, she believed, belonged to the distant past. Although she agreed that a vision for the future of Europe exists, she is not convinced that it is truly shared.

”If that were the case, we would have enough political will to implement at least some of the necessary reforms within the European Union. But so, we see that even one member state or just one leader, and we certainly have at least one such leader, who does not share this common vision, can be enough to block or to a large extent stop or slow down positive changes.”

She thus highlighted the need for institutional reforms as one of the key challenges. “The paradox is that the European Parliament is the only directly elected institution among the three key ones, yet it has the least powers. If we want a Union that will function more effectively and democratically, a reform, that would give Parliament, as an institution where the majority rules, a greater role and weight in decision-making, is necessary.”

When asked about the power of young people, she pointed out that it is not necessary to choose between loudness and decency: “You can be loud, tell the truth decently and be heard.” She added that she is tired of the lack of transparency and when is not said how things stand and how much the European Union is concerned or how deeply it regrets a matter, as well as endless discussions without any real results. She criticized the EU’s passivity in the cases of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and the tragedy in Gaza: “If you proudly promote your values, principles and the rule of law on paper, but then fail to act when necessary, people rightly lose trust and the EU loses credibility.”

In conclusion, she emphasized that there is no better alternative than the European Union as such, but that it must prove that it defends its values ​​not only in theory, but above all in practice.

In addition to MEP Irena Joveva, the round table also included former EU Ambassador to the US Joao Vale de Almeida, former Foreign Minister of North Macedonia Nikola Dimitrov and ABP representative Aart Jan de Geus.

Dignity. What is it? Even more importantly: Where is it?

The basis of everything, the basis of man, but the first in line to be trampled on today. It is trampled on by people, who are not people. Those “people” who trample on people, who are people… but are dehumanized. What a paradox.

The world is running away. It is running away from responsibility, from common solutions, from order, security and stability, which we took for granted just yesterday. It is running away from dignity.

Dignity is the common thread of the jubilee largest Slovenian diplomatic event, and ‘The World Has Fleeed’ is its slogan this year.

This is not the first time I have been a part of the Bled Strategic Forum BSF, but this time is however special for me. Nine years ago, when I was still a journalist and panelist at the Bled Strategic Forum for Youth, I never imagined that I would one day be part of the big stage of the BSF. The world is running away and so is time. At tomorrow’s panel, we will discuss where and how to move forward, at a time, when Europe (again) stands at a crossroads.

Although there will be a lot of talk in Bled these days about strategic issues of the future of the world and Europe, this is not today’s biggest event. In fact, today is the biggest day for those who step over the school threshold. May their first step be brave, their path safe, and their curiosity boundless. May they be the ones from whom the world will not run away the way it runs away from us.

May they be the ones who will understand that dignity is not “something more”, but simply the foundation of a human being. Dignity can be a “nice dress” that is not necessarily special, or it can be an “ordinary” T-shirt that is anything but ordinary. I, for example, was both in Bled today.

“The hypocrisy of the leftists cannot be hidden. The European Parliament member and leader of the Svoboda list, Irena Joveva, recently voted in Brussels against the extension of the measure to fight child sexual abuse online, while at the same time publicly advocating for children’s rights in Gaza. She herself “warns” about the rise of “right-wing populism”, while perversely “unnoticeably” voting for sexual predators, but in confrontations she presents herself as a fighter for human rights. Is the perverted LGBT agenda and the sexualization of children so important to the leftists that they would even allow child abuse and pedophilia?”

You read a part of an article by some “media”. You know, the first one in the service of “truth”. It was towards the end of May 2024. A good two weeks before the European elections. They never had any real arguments to slander, so they just made them up. Or manipulated them. It was easier to hit below the belt, saying “Joveva, a politician and mother, supports child sexual abuse”.

And today? Today, they suddenly understand that a real fight against pedophilia is possible without spying on absolutely everyone. Today, of course, they also suddenly do not mention that I was the only one from Slovenia who voted against it at the time. It was about relaxing the rules directly related to the CSAM regulation, which is known as “chat control” today.

At that time, I was even asked about it on our national television. I came to a youth event on the future of the EU, and I was asked if I had really voted against the fight against child sexual abuse. I admit that I was outraged at the time. Outraged that a certain propaganda machine – as it has so many times before – had succeeded again.

And today? Today, I am so very happy that I can share with you this very statement of mine from back then. Because today, it is just one more proof that I am not one of those people who decide as they see fit at the moment. That I do not say – or do – something just because it is popular at that moment.

And today …. when I receive dozens of emails a day from rightly concerned people, what do I think about the “chat control” legislation, I think to myself… good morning. Orwell would be proud.

I don’t. Can you imagine someone from Whatsapp, a third party, reading your messages, looking at your photos and recordings – just in case?

Can you imagine? A photo of your child in a swimsuit that you send to your grandmother ends up in some global “control archive”. Or an intimate message to your partner. And then some Facebook employee can see it. Or, worse, it ends up in the hands of someone you don’t even want to know. Or someone who then uses it. For revenge, for pleasure, for… whatever. This is not security, this is a recipe for disaster. This is the end of encryption, the end of privacy and the largest archive of intimate content on the Internet. Something that criminals and pedophiles can’t wait for, by the way! A measure that is supposed to protect children, would actually expose both children and all of us even more. Because, wait, it’s about child safety. Irony in all its glory.

Today we would read messages “for the protection of children”. Tomorrow they will be read “for the security of the country”. And the day after tomorrow?

Let me be clear as always. Pedophilia must be prosecuted without mercy. That is why we have already adopted stricter penalties in the EU. But at the same time, I am convinced that the solution is not algorithms that will simply comb through everything we privately send to someone. The solution is awareness-raising, education of children and parents, effective work of the police and courts, strict legislation. And of course – clear rules that also protect our privacy.

“Chat control”? “Chat control” is a dangerous farce and as long as I am in the European Parliament, I will do everything to prevent it.

Anyone who believes that mass surveillance will protect children, believes in fairy tales. And this fairy tale in particular, is one without happy ending. Privacy is our right.

Where are you now, those of you who asked yourself a year ago, who am I protecting? Now I ask you. Who are you protecting? Who were you protecting yesterday, who are you protecting today, and who will you be protecting tomorrow?

– Irena

On Monday, August 26, 2025, at the Henry Jackson Society panel, European MP Irena Joveva took part in a discussion about the political crisis in Serbia following the tragic collapse of the canopy at the railway station in Novi Sad. In recent weeks, as Joveva pointed out, it has become more and more obvious that the government is losing ground under its feet. “They counted on the fact that the income of the summer would silence discontent and erase the memory of guilt, that people would forget about corruption and demands for responsibility, but the region underestimated the courage and determination of the people who would defend the rule of law in the country for months.”

Joveva emphasized that it has been a long time since the European Parliament called on the European Commission to take action against President Vučić’s regime: “I did not start to be loud only with protests or for the sake of the students as such – but for the sake of values ​​that they are fighting for and that they embody, because these are the same values ​​that the European Union represents.”

As she went on to assess, the system established by Vučić during his long reign has become dangerously similar to the one known in neighboring Hungary under Viktor Orban. In this regard, she expressed her disappointment that despite repeated calls to the Commission to make European funds conditional on respect for the rule of law, so far “nothing concrete has been done”.

Joveva drew attention to the geopolitical background that allows Vučić to maintain his power: “Vučić enjoys support not only in Russia and China, but also within the European Union, especially in France and Germany, whose leaders clearly prioritize lucrative economic and political interests over the rule of law.” But precisely because the fundamental pillars of democracy are failing in Serbia, namely freedom of the media, an independent judiciary and the police, which would have to serve the people, the European Union would have to play a much more active role, because in the case of Serbia, it is a matter of a candidate state”.

At the same time, she emphasized that the EU must not encroach on the right of the Serbian people to choose their own government. “Nor is it up to us, the European Union, to encroach on the right of the Serbian people to choose their own government. We must therefore support the values ​​and legally binding rules that must be implemented by every future member of the EU. Serbia is still oriented towards the EU – and that, frankly speaking, is its best alternative”.

Regarding Vučić’s willingness to engage in dialogue with students, Joveva emphasized that real dialogue in democratic societies takes place at pre-election meetings, where the arguments of both sides can be confronted openly and where the final decision on the future direction of the state will belong to the people. “In any democratic state, protests that lasted for weeks and a crisis that runs so deep would inevitably lead to early elections. But let’s not forget – those elections must be fair and free, otherwise nothing will change,’‘ she concluded.

In addition to European MP Joveva, professor Filip Ejdus and representative of the student movement Lazar Popović also participated in the panel.

I am deeply disturbed by the consequences of Saturday’s events in Austria, where heavily armed Austrian special units – without having a court order and without any prior warning – stormed a symbolic site of remembrance. Uniformed forces, helicopters, drones, long-barrelled weapons and police dogs were deployed against the descendants of victims of Nazi violence, against students, lecturers, and workshop organisers who, as they do every year, had gathered to pay solemn tribute to those who fell in the fight against fascism.

The official justification for this excessive and wholly disproportionate use of force was alleged breaches related to camping and environmental protection. Yet the true motives behind this display of brutality were anything but environmental – and this was clear to all. This was an attempt to criminalise historical remembrance; an attempt to silence those who, with dignity, preserve the spirit of resistance of the Slovenian people in a place that stands among the most powerful symbols of anti-fascist struggle on Austrian soil.

In this painful irony, it is especially absurd that those who peacefully and respectfully honoured the memory of past atrocities are now accused of indecent conduct, while the actions of those who carried out this raid inevitably recalled that tragic April eighty years ago, when Nazi units, at this very site, murdered eleven members of the Carinthian Slovene community.

Tragically, Saturday’s events are not an isolated incident targeting the Slovene community in Austria, but rather a manifestation of an increasingly troubling attitude of the Austrian authorities – both at federal and local level – towards this national community. The systematic undermining of Article 7 of the Austrian State Treaty – above all through the deliberate neglect of the right to use the Slovene language in bilingual areas, reductions in funding for minorities, symbolic appropriation of Slovene territory, and now repression against the guardians of the anti-fascist legacy – all signal a worrying departure from European values.

From Austria – as a member of the European Union and as a signatory of the Austrian State Treaty, which underpins its post-war sovereignty and obligations, without which post-war Austria could not have been established – I expect the full and credible implementation of Article 7. This means ensuring the linguistic, cultural, and political rights of the Slovene national community, guaranteeing its equal treatment, and creating the conditions for respectful and dignified coexistence with the majority population.

I therefore fully join the Slovenian Government’s call for a thorough, independent, and transparent investigation into this incident, for the identification of any abuse of power, and for appropriate accountability of all those involved. I also expect clear assurances from the Austrian authorities that such actions will never again be repeated – neither at the Peršman Farm, nor anywhere else.

On Tuesday, 23 July 2025, MEP Irena Joveva gave an open, emotional interview to the popular Macedonian magazine Ženski magazin, where she reflected on her roots, childhood, and personal journey from her  hometown of Jesenice to the halls of the European Parliament. In an honest and moving conversation, she also spoke about motherhood, political challenges, and the role of women in public life.

When asked about her childhood, she fondly recalled growing up in Jesenice – a place that remains close to her heart: “To me, it will always be the most beautiful town in the world,” she said, “precisely because of the memories I carry from those early years.” Raised in a close-knit housing estate, surrounded by families who had migrated from across the former Yugoslavia, she remembers a spirit of solidarity, where “neighbour stood by neighbour” wasn’t just a saying, but a way of life.

Proud of her heritage, Joveva emphasized that she has never been ashamed of her roots, her surname, or her family. She grew up between two cultures — Slovenian and Macedonian — and embraced both. For nearly a decade, she attended supplementary Macedonian language classes, and for almost twenty years she danced in a Macedonian folk group affiliated with the cultural association Ilinden, where she remains an active member.

Reflecting on her visits to North Macedonia, she said they were far more frequent during her childhood — unforgettable trips filled with warmth, genuine friendships, and even a first love. While her visits are now more occasional due to work and family responsibilities, she maintains strong ties with loved ones and continues to nurture her cultural roots.

Her recent speech in the European Parliament — in which she defended the Macedonian language and identity — resonated powerfully with audiences both in and outside Macedonia. She confessed that she had no expectations when she delivered the speech, nor did she seek attention:


“I simply said what should already be obvious to everyone,” she explained. Still, she was moved by the fact that her words reached not only those who supported her but also those who perhaps needed to hear them most.

As a woman in politics, Joveva has long faced prejudice and, at times, double standards. What frustrates her most is the fact that, even in 2025, the political sphere is still largely male-dominated — something she believes should no longer be the case: “The only things that should matter are one’s work and results, not gender,” she stated.

She has learned to live with public scrutiny — and has even come to expect targeted attacks and attempts to discredit her. What still hurts, though, are the attacks directed at her family:”Reading lies about myself doesn’t faze me anymore,” she admitted. “But when someone targets my family — that’s different. That cuts deep.”

One such moment came recently on social media, where she was mocked because of her parents’ professions.

“It hurt to see someone ridicule honest work — in this case, my parents’. I’m proud that my mother was a cleaner and my father worked in the steel industry. Nothing was handed to me, and even less to them. I am living proof that success doesn’t require connections — and certainly not shortcuts — just hard work and integrity.”

Although she generally follows parliamentary protocol, she admitted that at times she consciously breaks the rules — out of principle.“These days, it feels nearly impossible to remain ‘correct’ in a political system so often led by people whose values exist only on paper — stashed away in some forgotten drawer,” she said.

She recounted one such moment: standing in the European Parliament chamber, holding up a photograph of Yazan, a young boy who died as a result of hunger and genocide in Gaza. The image was shown for only a few seconds before she was warned to turn off her microphone — but the moment remains unforgettable:

“That surge of adrenaline — not just because the session was chaired by a German MEP — but because of the responsibility I felt in that moment. I knew I was on the right side of history.” “In such cases,” she continued, “it’s more ethical — in all its irony — to break the rules with your head held high than to nod along in silence. I am proud to give a voice to those who don’t have one, whenever I get the chance. That’s why I ended my recent address in the Macedonian language. If humanity has a price, I’ll pay it gladly.”

When asked about the greatest source of support in her life, she named her family — first and foremost, her late mother, whose presence continues to guide her every step: “She is still my greatest inspiration. I’ve never met — and probably never will meet — a stronger and more just person.” She added that her father’s steady support, her partner’s encouragement, and the presence of her young daughter Mila — “a source of strength she doesn’t even realize she holds yet” — have all shaped her path.

When asked what she would change for women in Europe if given the chance, she didn’t name a specific policy or law, but rather a shift in mindset:


“Less envy, more empathy. Less pressure to look or be perfect. And the understanding that you don’t need an ‘Instagram body’ to be worthy.”

She admitted that appearances have never been of great importance to her — though she understands how social expectations can shape public perception:

“Personally, I couldn’t care less what someone is wearing. But I do get it — there’s a widespread belief that people trust someone more if they’re wearing a blazer or a suit rather than a sweater and jeans. I remember as a kid, people always noticed who wore something new. I never did. Because clothes, material things — they never really mattered to me.”

Toward the end of the interview, Joveva shared a tender reflection on her late mother’s cooking — and her regret at not having written down more of her treasured recipes:

“It’s something I’ll never forgive myself for. Back then, we didn’t have smartphones to record everything. And I was just a teenager, not yet aware of what it would mean to carry her culinary legacy forward in today’s chaotic life.”

With a warm smile, she added: “Let professional chefs forgive me — but my mom was the best cook in the world. My favorite Macedonian dish? Tavče gravče. She made it perfectly. I’m not there yet. But one day, I hope to be.”

You can read the entire interview at the following link.

On Monday, July 11, 2025, Slovenian Member of the European Parliament Irena Joveva gave an in-depth interview to Monitor, an independent Montenegrin weekly. She discussed a range of pressing issues—from the vote of no confidence in European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the tense geopolitical climate in the Middle East and Serbia, to NATO defense spending and a controversial resolution on postwar communist crimes in Slovenia. She concluded with reflections on Montenegro’s EU accession prospects.

Joveva began by addressing the recent no-confidence vote against von der Leyen. She reiterated her longstanding criticism of the Commission President, particularly over the lack of transparency in high-stakes negotiations—most notably the vaccine procurement deal with Pfizer:

“Decisions as critical as vaccine purchases cannot be made through text messages. While we can’t change how the Commission handled the process, we can and must be clear: there is no room for secrecy when public funds are at stake.”

Turning to the Western Balkans, Joveva expressed concern over the continued ethnic polarization in the region. She pointed out that certain political actors deliberately maintain divisions by weaponizing fear, hatred, and historical distortion to cling to power. However, she emphasized that responsibility lies not only with local leaders but also with the European Union, whose approach to the region she described as fundamentally flawed:

“For years, the EU’s policy toward the Western Balkans has been shaped by the mantra of ‘stability at any cost.’ That often means preserving geopolitical balance to protect economic interests—even when that entails turning a blind eye to authoritarianism.”

Commenting on rising NATO defense spending, Joveva rejected the notion that this reflects a victory for U.S. President Donald Trump. Instead, she sees it as a growing consensus among EU member states to invest in their own security amidst increasing global uncertainty. In her view, the European Union must move beyond dependence on the United States and achieve true strategic autonomy—in both economic resilience and defense.

She also addressed a recently adopted European Parliament resolution on the remembrance of victims of Slovenia’s postwar communist regime. Joveva strongly condemned the politicization of such complex historical issues, particularly by opposition forces in Slovenia:

“It is unacceptable to weaponize sensitive historical topics for electioneering. Certain parties are distorting historical facts to build political capital—and that’s a disservice not just to the past, but to our democratic future.”

In this context, she criticized the European Union’s muted response to a controversial concert by Croatian singer Thompson in Zagreb. She reminded readers of Europe’s historic stance against extremist ideologies:‘“Europe once drew a clear line against glorifying ideologies like Nazism and fascism. We cannot afford to ignore such trends today—they must be explicitly condemned. The issue isn’t just the artist himself, but the social normalization of ideologies that should remain permanently discredited. Unfortunately, social media and sensationalist journalism have only fueled this trend. What’s especially disturbing is the attendance of a former Slovenian prime minister—a self-proclaimed ‘patriot’—who seemed to enjoy songs performed by an artist known for opening concerts with Ustasha salute.”

In relation to the Middle East, Joveva voiced deep concern over what she described as “the most documented genocide in modern history.” She expressed her disappointment at the lack of international resolve to establish a ceasefire and a path toward lasting peace:

“Some EU member states—Germany in particular—have chosen not to speak out in defense of the oppressed. The extent of the enforced pro-Israel stance is increasingly worrying. While I understand Germany’s historical burden, the way it’s attempting to ‘atone’ is taking things to the opposite extreme.”

Finally, when asked about Montenegro’s path to EU membership, Joveva expressed optimism. She praised the country’s recent progress, as reflected in the latest EU progress report, and highlighted the broad political consensus in support of integration.

“Montenegro has become a symbol that the European perspective for the Western Balkans is still alive. I’m confident it will become the EU’s 28th member state.”

The full interview is available at the following link.

“Can a person get used to war? Of course, they can. I got used to it. I don’t like it, but I did. I live according to the existing conditions, I work, think, eat… But – can a person get used to it and remain normal? That’s a more difficult question. A kind of Friday decided about Irma. I had long forgotten that there is such a thing as Friday, then the weekend, then holidays and similar things, and the month of August is ideal for sunbathing, swimming and similar joys of carefree people. For us, this does not exist. They assigned us another kind of sport. A game with death. Yours or someone else’s, but in the game there is always only one thing – to exist or not to exist. As if that is something. What is important? To survive at all costs? That is not important either. It is important to live as a human being, but if it doesn’t work, then nothing else matters. Not even to live. So go and do what you can to remain human. Otherwise, nothing will matter.”

You have read a passage from a book that I have been reading for months. Not because I could not spare those few minutes before going to bed, but because the personal story of the author of The Sarajevo Princess, doctor Edo Jaganjac, is so deeply moving that …

… it is difficult to comprehend. Is it really so difficult to be human in inhuman conditions? How is it possible that nothing is sacred, not even the lives of children and young people?

And today, when many – especially young people – are courageously standing up against autocracy, against the falsification of history and against dehumanization, it is crucial to understand that the crime in Srebrenica has a name. Genocide. This is not an opinion, but a fact confirmed in the courts.

With the responsibility of individuals – not of a nation.

This is a demand for responsibility – not collective guilt.

This is respect for the victims – and for all those who, within Serbia or anywhere else in this world, want a society without denial, without manipulation and without glorification of criminals.

This is a demand that heads not be turned when international humanitarian law is only valid on paper.

When even hunger is a deadly weapon.

When a child in Gaza, seeking only a sip of water, does not know if he will survive.

When a hospital or a refugee camp is no longer a protection or a refuge, but a potential trap.

When the international community is too late to prevent these atrocities. As it has been so many times before. As it was 30 years ago. Again.

The international legal order is collapsing not only under the weight of bombs, but also under the weight of indifference. Dehumanization. And with looking away.

“So go and do what you can to remain human. Otherwise, nothing will matter.”

 

On Tuesday, July 8, 2025, Slovenian Member of the European Parliament Irena Joveva took part in a plenary debate on the European Commission’s progress report on North Macedonia for the years 2023 and 2024. In a powerful and emotional speech, she reminded her colleagues that the report reflects the European journey of a candidate country and its people.

At the outset, Joveva emphasized that the purpose of the report is to monitor the progress of a candidate country that has, throughout its accession process, faced repeated instances of unjustified conditionality, political blockades, and disrespect. Despite these obstacles, she said, the people of North Macedonia have consistently upheld the values the EU claims to champion—perhaps more so than some current member states.

She was unequivocal in stating that the report must not, under any circumstances, become a forum for debating the existence of the Macedonian nation, its language, or identity:

“While I personally support the paragraph in question and will not vote to have it removed, I must be honest with the Macedonian people: I know it hurts. It hurts me, too. But do not accept the narrative that the European Parliament has taken your identity or language from you. That is simply not true.“

Joveva went on to condemn political manipulation and populist misinterpretations that exploit sensitive issues of identity to undermine both the EU enlargement process and public trust in European institutions. “The Macedonian language is authentic. Your attempts to deny it are modern-day fiction. A national identity that has endured for centuries will not be erased by one vote or your lobbying.”

She concluded her speech by reminding that the Macedonian nation does not need anyone else’s permission to exist.

Foto/EP: Brigitte HASE

On Tuesday, July 8, 2025, Slovenian Member of the European Parliament Irena Joveva took part in the European Parliament’s plenary session during a debate on the state of implementation of the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) across EU Member States.

Joveva opened her remarks by stressing that EMFA stands as one of the cornerstone legislative achievements of the Parliament’s previous term. The act was developed in response to growing concerns over media interference and political pressure—concerns rooted not in theory, but in real, lived experiences, including her own country:

“This legislation was born out of necessity. It came as a response to direct political attacks—such as those by the Janša government on the Slovenian Press Agency and RTV Slovenia. Unfortunately. And when you experience this firsthand, you understand just how vital strong European safeguards really are.”

She warned that while the act is set to come fully into force in just one month, many Member States are failing to take its implementation seriously. Some have yet to begin preparations at all. In light of this, Joveva called on the European Commission to immediately initiate infringement proceedings against governments that are falling behind:

“Since the act’s adoption, media freedom has deteriorated in parts of the EU—Slovakia is just one example. And no media outlet anywhere in Europe is truly immune to political pressure. Media freedom is like any other freedom: once it’s suffocated, it’s incredibly hard to bring back. Its value only becomes clear when it’s gone.”

She also underlined that the EMFA includes a range of crucial safeguards: protection for journalists and editors from political interference, insulation from private interests, and limits on the unaccountable influence of digital platforms. But these guarantees, she stressed, are only as strong as the political will to enforce them:

“Provisions on paper are not enough. Without firm, consistent implementation—especially by the Commission—these safeguards risk remaining little more than principled declarations, devoid of real impact.”